View Full Version : Did
CaptKicass
April 20th, 2004, 10:10 pm
u know i was hear, lov the spellin i know. :yes: seen many of u out and a bout, been commin hear 4 years, first stop evey day waitin 4 the demo of all times. :scared: so were is it? :sleep:
IDAHO
April 20th, 2004, 10:55 pm
comming soon :no:
Torsion
April 20th, 2004, 11:18 pm
What demo would that be?
Rafal Dudek
April 21st, 2004, 12:35 am
What demo would that be?
Playboy Mansion hehe :p:
Shaolin K
April 21st, 2004, 01:23 am
I do believe that would be Playboy Mansion 3D :D:
Terry Penrod
April 21st, 2004, 03:45 am
.
Are fake 3D boobies really better than fake 2D boobies?
No, really... I want to know.
Cheers, Terry
.
CaptKicass
April 21st, 2004, 12:25 pm
What demo would that be?
The one that puts me back in my chair like kingpin did. At this point going bac 2 sof2. Far cry was ok, but maps very large and a lack of blood.
Eddie Ismail
May 1st, 2004, 03:42 pm
Mmmmmm, playboy mansion 3D, nice.
Chylde Roland
May 1st, 2004, 08:45 pm
ok, this thread is plain weird.
:rolleyes:
IDAHO
May 3rd, 2004, 05:32 am
The one that puts me back in my chair like kingpin did. At this point going bac 2 sof2. Far cry was ok, but maps very large and a lack of blood.
postal 2 - share the pain ?
2-3 patches out & bloody & over the edge , violence wise :thumbup:
loved the cat silencer in sngl plyr
the add on cd is ten bucks , gona mess with it as i've seen some serious mods & tons of user maps/skinz
could be a decient change , as gaming is suposed to be fun / less i (we) forgot , in this day of " high rez - super enjine - bs "
maybe the "fun" could be as simple as a swing @ your neck with my shovel :yes:
DejaFu
May 3rd, 2004, 05:25 pm
this post confuses me
Terry Penrod
May 3rd, 2004, 05:44 pm
.
This whole thread confuses me.
Cheers, Terry
.
DanTheManPR
May 3rd, 2004, 06:58 pm
Are fake 3D boobies really better than fake 2D boobies?
sometimes "2D" is perferable - but only if the rez is high
However, nowadays the tech of 3D boobies is quite titilating. here is an article from "Science" describing the "jiggle theorem":
Moore: As I said, the tools aren't there. An artist could work for a month trying to animate a firm C-cup and not get it right. And, a double-D behaves tremendously different in a midriff tank-top than it would in a tight tube-top -- try it someday! Can you draw for me the difference between the bounce of a B-cup in a moist tee-shirt vs. an A-cup that's using a wonderbra? You need expert physicists to unravel these mysteries.
Fargo: Physics?
Moore: Right. That's our specialty: Applied anatomical physics. For example, take a good look at this picture of a woman endowed with a tremendous set of martial arts abilities.
http://archive.gamespy.com/fargo/january02/jiggle/Bendover1.jpg
Fargo: I find it difficult not to.
Moore: Good. Now, as she bends down to make her move, you can see several forces being applied to her plump, firm, ripened melons. And there's inertia to consider, plus the make and cut of the fabric and, of course, the cold weather. Newton's second law tells us how to calculate the acceleration of a body once we know the forces acting on it. The forces may vary as the body moves, but, provided we can write explicit expressions for how the forces vary with time, position, tautness, and velocity, we can determine the delicious acceleration of the body at every point during its motion, as well as whether or not it will "pop out," jeopardizing the game's rating. See here:
http://archive.gamespy.com/fargo/january02/jiggle/Bendover2.jpg
Moore: Now all we need to do to locate the body at any given point in time is to simply substitute the appropriate data into the kinematic equations. Here at T&A Imaging we've put together formulae for everything from underwire bras to spandex. And I, personally, have put in hours and hours of field research. As you can see from the final results, hard physics -- oh so very hard -- pays off again with the convincing illusion of mammary motion like a delicious quivering zip-lock bag fulla chocolate puddin'.
http://archive.gamespy.com/fargo/january02/jiggle/Bendover3.jpg
Fargo: Impressive.
Moore: I'm typing with one hand!
Here (http://archive.gamespy.com/fargo/january02/jiggle/) is the full text of that report.
The obvious conclusion that we can reach is that 3D boobies are better, BUT ONLY WHEN THE TECH IS GOOD.
Terry Penrod
May 3rd, 2004, 07:11 pm
.
Well that clears that up.
Cheers, Terry
.
Fzoulcmbyl
May 3rd, 2004, 09:03 pm
:lol2:
Very nice Dan.....
:thumbup:
Fzoul
Circlebreaker
May 4th, 2004, 05:19 am
Wow, the things you can learn here...
:lol:
IDAHO
May 4th, 2004, 05:17 pm
"For example, take a good look at this picture of a woman endowed with a tremendous set of martial arts abilities."
:eek:
now I'm confused :wtf: :scared:
eeeeeeeeeerrrrrrrrrrrrrrr :drink: :whip:
:thumbup:
Terry Penrod
May 5th, 2004, 11:54 am
.
You need to read between the (panty) lines.
Cheers, Terry
.
vBulletin® v3.8.4, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.